SAUTIResearch

AI-enhanced assessment of hybrid musical competencies · Kenyan folk-fusion curricula

The machine measures the signal. The instructor judges the music.

Sauti bifurcates performance assessment into signal-invariant technical evidence, computed transparently, and culturally situated judgement, reserved entirely for human authority. Every divergence between the two is preserved as research data.

Figure — amplitude motif, fixed seed. Not measurement data.

Domain 1 · Computed evidence

Signal-invariant measurement

The analysis engine reports only what a signal can attest to without a culturally learned category — with per-metric confidence and self-declared caveats. It is architecturally incapable of producing a grade: its output type has no field for one.

  • Pitch stability (monophonic F0 tracking)
  • Onset detection & beat alignment
  • Tempo induction & local tempo drift
  • Timing precision against the beat grid
  • RMS energy & dynamic range
  • Spectral centroid & waveform views

Domain 2 · Human authority

Cultural judgement, behaviourally anchored

Instructors score the dimensions no signal statistic can carry, against rubrics validated with cultural representatives. The final grade derives from instructor judgement alone, and a representative's determination governs restricted material.

  • Improvisational authenticity
  • Cultural appropriateness
  • Expressive depth
  • Musical creativity & interpretation
  • Performance communication & ensemble
  • Stage confidence

When they disagree, the human decides — and the disagreement becomes data.

Every instructor divergence records the computed value, the human value and a written rationale in an append-only log. That log is not a system feature; it is a primary source of the study's evidence on where automated measurement fails hybrid-genre performance.

What the instrument does

Assessment workspace
Waveform, pitch, tempo and energy beside the full rubric — one screen, two clearly separated epistemologies.
Dual-condition study design
Every assessment runs in the AI-assisted or the conventional arm, timed for the within-subjects efficiency comparison.
Cultural governance
A score at the trigger level on cultural appropriateness withholds the grade and routes the assessment to representative review.
Research export
CSV, Excel, JSON and SPSS-ready syntax carrying the raw paired observations, not only the statistics computed from them.
In-browser signal engine
Onset, tempo, pitch and energy analysis runs over the Web Audio API on the assessor's own device — inspectable and reproducible.
Reports with provenance
Printable reports that keep computed evidence and human judgement visually and semantically distinct.